Global Warming Has Accelerated. Why?
What Are the Consequences?
12 February 2025
James Hansen and Pushker Kharecha
James Edward Hansen (born March 29, 1941) is an American adjunct professor directing the Program on Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. He is best known for his research in climatology, his 1988 Congressional testimony on climate change that helped raise broad awareness of global warming, and his advocacy of action to avoid dangerous climate change. In recent years, he has become a climate activist to mitigate the effects of global warming, on a few occasions leading to his arrest. — Wikiwand
“We don't need no stinkin' science” to know that climate change is a big fat hoax! Just look at the people and organizations that are promoting the idea of a pending climate meltdown — Gates, Schwab & the WEFistas, the UNO, and the idiotic projects that our GreenGovernments are spending our tax monies on! Wind Farms, Solar Farms — what insanity!
Click on the image and download the book?!? <snort> “We don't need no stinkin' scientists to tell us…”
Everybody knows that the climate has always been changing and that at least fifty different variables affect climate. “Scientists” such as Hansen are arrogant fools who are probably getting a kickback from someone or other, “scientistis” who suffer the megalomaniac illusion that man currently is the formost ‘creator’ of climate change. Who needs to read such books? In short, the global destruction fear is at least as ridiculous as the the thesis that unless the fear of God increases, the end of the world is imminent.
So there. Nevermind such things as this:
Or this:
What you really need to know is this:
See? We need to drive more, fly more, burn up as much fossil fuel as possible or the survival of the world’s vegetation will be threatened! I wonder who finances these truth-tellers? The Heartland Institute perhaps.1
And what good sense it was for the Trump regime to withdraw from the Paris Agreement!
And I’m SO disapointed that one of my favorite writers — Jonathan Cook — could write such nonsense as the follwing: (please don’t read the following, it’ll just make you mad…
Why action on the climate crisis is all hot air
Capitalism's endless growth paradigm can't be squared with sustainability. But no one – from politicians to the protest movement – is willing to admit the truth
Jonathan Cook
12 Aug 2023
[First published by Middle East Eye]
The debate about the climate crisis should have been settled in the early 1990s. And yet, three decades later, the extent, imminence and even existence of a looming catastrophe are still hotly disputed. That is not by accident.
David Attenborough is on social media pleading, once more, for mankind to do something before tipping points are surpassed that cannot be reversed and temperatures begin to rise inexorably, whatever we do.
In the same vein, Antonio Guterres, the United Nations' secretary general, warned late last month that humanity has shifted from the era of global warming to “global boiling”. Record temperatures keep being broken, while wildfires and floods have become a news staple.
Scientists’ updated models now predict the first breach of the limit of 1.5C mean temperature rise for the globe, set by the 2015 Paris Agreement, in a matter of a few years, rather than decades. This week it was announced that July had been the hottest month globally on record, a jump of 0.33C above the previous record.
The Middle East is likely to feel the worst effects early, with large parts of the region least able to cope with the heavy costs of adapting.
Water scarcity, extreme heat, food insecurity and desertification will make life increasingly tough, triggering migration and conflict.
And yet inaction on curbing fossil fuel use continues.
~~~~~~
read the rest here, it is top class with a great number of supporting references.
Trolling for trolls - Go ahead - make my day and say something idiotic in the comments.
The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian 501(c)(3) nonprofit public policy think tank known for its rejection of both the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.