Wednesday, March 8, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
The New York Times ran an unrelated story yesterday finally exposing the Nordsteam bombing culprit, sort of, headlined “Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Pipelines, U.S. Officials Say.”
A shocking revelation. Can you believe that? A pro-Ukrainian group? (Wait — are WE pro-Ukrainian?)
The article cites “new intelligence” received by our crack team of experienced, masterful U.S. intelligence agents, who were able to determine from the otherwise-unidentified new evidence that the bombing of Russia’s critical gas pipelines must have been a sneaky pro-Ukrainian group, and was not a crafty pro-Russia group.
The existence of the unidentified evidence was disclosed by unidentified anonymous U.S. officials, who were deliberately un-specific about what the “new evidence” might in fact be:
U.S. officials declined to disclose the nature of the intelligence, how it was obtained or any details of the strength of the evidence it contains. They have said that there are no firm conclusions about it[.]
Is it just a hunch? The New York Times wrote a ten-page, long-form article packed with speculation and decorated with stock photos, all based on undescribed “evidence” allegedly referenced by unnamed anonymous sources.
I wonder who told the New York Times to write this article based on NOTHING.
At least the article briefly mentioned Seymour Hersh’s exposé, but only to dismiss his explosive allegations, having omitted any mention of his own confidential sources, and making it sound like Hersh’s entire story was based on Biden’s public threats against the pipeline:
Last month, the investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published an article on the newsletter platform Substack concluding that the United States carried out the operation at the direction of Mr. Biden. In making his case, Mr. Hersh cited the president’s preinvasion threat to “bring an end” to Nord Stream 2, and similar statements by other senior U.S. officials.
The Times airily dismissed Hersh’s investigation by sighing that the Biden Administration SAID it had nothing to do with the bombing — and that was that. They denied it, so.
U.S. officials also insisted that they have no idea whatsoever what the Ukrainians might be up to:
Despite Ukraine’s deep dependence on the United States for military, intelligence and diplomatic support, Ukrainian officials are not always transparent with their American counterparts about their military operations, especially those against Russian targets behind enemy lines. Those operations have frustrated U.S. officials, who believe that they have not measurably improved Ukraine’s position on the battlefield, but have risked alienating European allies and widening the war.
We can figure a lot of stuff out, but the Ukrainians, well we just have no way of knowing. You believe that, right?
The Ukraine Off Ramp? German/Western Support For Ukraine Implodes With Help Of Fake Story About Nordstream Sprung By NYT/WaPo
A Very Bad Week For The "Build Back Better" Crowd, As Everything They Spent Hundreds of Billions on Implodes and Collapses Before The World's Eyes
“The Germans are going to use the terrorist attack against their infrastructure as the excuse to pull out of the Ukraine project. Olaf Scholtz went to the US to tell Biden: Either YOU blame Ukraine so we can pull our support for Ukraine—or WE blame YOU and pull out of NATO.”
—Gonzalo Lira
Another example:
NTD News Today (March 9): CCP Tops List of Security Threats: US Official
The Chinese Communist Party is the biggest threat to U.S. national security and leadership globally, according to the U.S. Director Of National Intelligence at a Senate hearing on Global Security Threats yesterday.
My comment:
How many pipelines has the CCP blown up lately?
It is not the CCP but rather the ACP that is the #1 threat to life on earth.
ACP = American Capitalist Party